The best RugCheck alternative depends on what you want checked twice: Bubblemaps for linked wallets, GoPlus or De.Fi Scanner for a separate read of the token's settings, Solsniffer for a second score, and Before It Rugs for a grade weighted by launch stage with a published track record. RugCheck is still one of the most detailed free reports on a Solana token, so most people use an alternative alongside it rather than instead of it.
We run Before It Rugs, which uses RugCheck reports as one of its data sources, so we have no reason to knock it. This page is about filling the gaps any single tool leaves. Facts about each tool come from its own site or documentation, checked on 26 October 2026.
What RugCheck does well
RugCheck reads a token's on-chain setup and turns it into a report: a risk score from 0 to 100 where lower is safer, a list of risks, the top holders, insider networks (wallets that trade or pass tokens between themselves), and how much of the liquidity is locked. It covers Solana and Fogo, it is free to read with no sign-in, and RugCheck says it never adjusts the score for a single project. Our guide to reading a RugCheck report explains every field.
When a second opinion helps
You don't need three tools for every coin. A second look earns its time in these cases:
- The score sits near a band edge. RugCheck's docs put Good below about 21 and Danger above about 40. A coin at 19 and one at 23 are much the same, but the labels differ.
- The coin is still on a launchpad. A coin on pump.fun's bonding curve has no normal pool yet, so liquidity warnings can read oddly. The holder picture matters more at that stage.
- One warning carries the whole score. If a single item drives the result, check that item somewhere else, ideally on the blockchain itself with Solscan.
- You see a "Verified" badge. On RugCheck, creators pay 150 USDC for a verified badge to prove they made the token. It helps you spot copycats. It doesn't say anything about whether the coin is likely to collapse.
- The holders look spread out, but the coin is new. Insiders can spread supply across wallets. A map of who has sent tokens to whom shows links a list can't.
What each alternative adds
| Alternative | What it adds | Its own data, or RugCheck's? | Most useful when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bubblemaps | A map of the top 250 holders and the transfers between them | Its own map of on-chain transfers | You suspect several holders are one person |
| GoPlus | A plain list of the token's settings, from mint and freeze to fees and hooks | Its own checks (Solana in beta) | The token uses Token-2022 features |
| De.Fi Scanner | A long list of detectors, a Safety Score and a PDF report | Its own checks | You want each contract check spelled out |
| Solsniffer | A Snifscore out of 100, 20+ indicators and holder clusters | Its own algorithm over several data providers | You want a second score made a different way |
| Token Sniffer | Contract code compared with 10,000+ known scam patterns | Its own pattern database | The coin is on another chain, or might impersonate a known token |
| DexScreener | A short audit panel next to the chart | External auditors | You are already on the chart and want a first glance |
| Before It Rugs | An A to F grade weighted by launch stage, plain-English reasons, and a public record of how grades turned out | RugCheck's report plus market data | The coin is minutes old, or you want to see a tool's track record |
Bubblemaps
This is the alternative that adds the most. Bubblemaps draws a token's top 250 holders as bubbles, with lines where wallets have sent tokens to each other, and gives a score from 0 to 100 where higher means the supply is more spread out. The map is free to view without logging in. Some extras are limited to holders of its $BMT token. It won't tell you about mint authority or liquidity locks, so it is a partner for RugCheck, not a replacement. See how to read Bubblemaps.
GoPlus
GoPlus runs a free web check for Solana tokens with no sign-in. It lists risky items and items needing attention: whether the token can be minted or frozen, whether the program can be closed, whether balances can be changed, transfer fees, transfer hooks, mutable metadata, the top 10 holders and the pools. There is no overall grade, which some people find clearer. GoPlus labels its Solana check as beta.
De.Fi Scanner
De.Fi Scanner shows high-risk items, items needing attention, a Safety Score out of 100 and more than 20 named checks on a Solana token, plus the top 10 holders. You can use the basic version as a guest. Its FAQ lists Ethereum-style chains, and its scanner page now adds Solana. On the established token we tried, its liquidity section showed no data, so don't rely on it for liquidity.
Solsniffer
Solsniffer gives each token a Snifscore out of 100 and marks each check as a risk or a pass: mint and freeze authority, liquidity burned or locked, the top 10 and 20 holders, metadata, fees and the token's age. Its guide says it uses more than 22 indicators and data from several providers. Scans are free to view, and the API has a free plan of 100 calls a month.
Token Sniffer
Token Sniffer's documentation lists 16 chains, including Solana. It compares contract code with a database of known scam patterns and flags impersonator tokens and tokens with phishing links in their names. We could only check its API documentation, because its main website showed a bot check on 26 October 2026. The API starts at $99 a month.
DexScreener
Every DexScreener token page has an Audit panel. On the Solana tokens we checked, it showed whether the token is mintable or freezable, with a note that the data comes from external auditors and may not be fully accurate. GoPlus says DexScreener's security checks are built on its API. Remember that boosts on DexScreener are paid promotion, not a quality signal.
Before It Rugs
We are not an independent read of RugCheck's data, because RugCheck is one of our sources. What we add is different weighting and a record. Each warning sign adds points, weighted by whether the coin is still on a launchpad or already on an open pool, and every point comes with a reason in plain English. The scorecard then shows how often coins with each first grade collapsed within a day, misses included. Grades given before we changed the rules on 26 October 2026 are kept separate. See the methodology or check a coin.
A two-minute second opinion
- Open the coin on RugCheck and note the top two or three risks.
- Open the same address on Bubblemaps and look for one cluster holding a large share.
- If the token has unusual settings, run it through GoPlus.
- If it is new, look it up on our rug check for its stage and grade.
Always search by contract address, not by name, because copycat tokens share names.
When the tools disagree
Disagreement is information, not noise. If RugCheck says Good and Bubblemaps shows one cluster with 40% of the supply, the cluster is the finding. If GoPlus flags a transfer fee that another tool missed, check the fee yourself before going any further. A coin rarely gets safer because one tool is quiet. Weigh the most specific warning, not the friendliest summary.
Is there a free alternative to RugCheck?
Yes. Bubblemaps, GoPlus, De.Fi Scanner, Solsniffer, DexScreener and Before It Rugs all let you check a Solana token for free, with no wallet connection. Token Sniffer's API is paid, and we couldn't confirm whether its web check is free.
Is Solsniffer better than RugCheck?
Neither is better at everything. RugCheck's report goes deeper on insider networks and liquidity locks. Solsniffer adds a second score built a different way and a holder cluster view. Neither publishes how accurate its scores are, so using both and reading the reasons is more useful than picking a winner.
Is Before It Rugs independent of RugCheck?
Not on the token data. We use RugCheck reports, along with DexScreener and GeckoTerminal market data. Our grade weights the signs differently and tracks what happened next. For an independent second look, use a tool with its own data, such as Bubblemaps or GoPlus.
Do I need more than one rug checker?
For any coin you are seriously looking at, two is sensible: one for the token's settings and one for its holders. No number of tools makes a coin safe. Checkers can't see slow rug pulls, hidden insiders or paid hype.
Related
- Solana rug checkers compared
- How accurate are rug checkers?
- Insider wallets and why many holders can really be one
- Can a coin that passes every check still rug?